Dr. Friedrich Rosenfeld
Partner
Dr. Friedrich Rosenfeld
Rechtsanwalt
Dr. Friedrich Rosenfeld ist als Parteivertreter und als Schiedsrichter tätig. Er hat Unternehmen und Staaten in einer Vielzahl von Schiedsverfahren in den Branchen privates Baurecht, Post-M&A, internationaler Handel und Investitionsschutz vertreten. Darüber hinaus hat er Erfahrung als Schiedsrichter in Schiedsverfahren nach verschiedenen Rechtsordnungen (u.a. Deutschland, Dänemark, Frankreich, Griechenland, Israel, Mazedonien, Österreich, Schweiz, USA). Seine Expertise in Schiedsverfahren ist international anerkannt.
Neben seiner Vollzeittätigkeit als Anwalt ist Dr. Rosenfeld Global Adjunct Professor an der NYU (Campus Paris), Lehrbeauftrager an der Bucerius Law School in Hamburg sowie Visiting Professor an der International Hellenic University in Thessaloniki. Er hat fünf Bücher und verschiedene Aufsätze zum Schiedsrecht veröffentlicht.
Dr. Rosenfeld studierte an der Bucerius Law School in Hamburg und an der Columbia Law School in New York. Vor seiner Tätigkeit bei HANEFELD war er als Consultant für die United Nations Assistance to the Khmer Rouge Trials in Kambodscha tätig. Er spricht Deutsch, Englisch, Französisch und Spanisch.
Parteivertretung in Schiedsverfahren
Vertretung deutscher und ausländischer Unternehmen in nationalen und internationalen Schiedsverfahren
- Schiedsorte: Deutschland, Niederlande, Japan, Türkei, Schweiz, Israel
- Anwendbares Recht: Deutsch, Türkisch, Katarisch, Niederländisch, Japanisch, Israelisch, internationales Recht
Schiedsrichtertätigkeit
Eilschiedsrichter, Einzelschiedsrichter, Mitschiedsrichter und Vorsitzender nach den Regeln der ICC, der DIS, des Voldgiftsinstituttet (DIA), des ICDR, des VIAC, der Hamburger Handelskammer sowie in ad hoc Verfahren.
- Schiedsorte: Deutschland, Frankreich, Schweiz, Dänemark, USA, Österreich, Israel, Griechenland
- Anwendbares materielles Recht: Griechisch, Englisch, Deutsch, Dänisch, Mazedonisch, Österreichisch, Israelisch
Parteivertretung in Prozessen / Gutachtertätigkeit
- Vertretung von Unternehmen und Staaten (Schwerpunkt: Vollstreckung von Schiedssprüchen)
- Parteibenannter Gutachter zu völkerrechtlichen Fragen
- Experte und Consultant für verschiedene internationale Organisationen
- Schiedsverfahren in den Bereichen Investitionsschutz, Post-M&A, privates Baurecht, Energie, Handel
- Völkerrecht und Verfahren mit Staatenbeteiligung
Deutsch
- Deutsch
- Englisch
- Französisch
- Spanisch
- „Dr. Friedrich Rosenfeld [ist ein] brillanter Kopf.”
JUVE - „Dr. Friedrich Rosenfeld ist entscheidungsstark.”
JUVE - „Dr. Friedrich Rosenfeld ist exzellent.”
JUVE - „A dedicated sharp lawyer with strong analytical skills and the ability to understand complex legal systems.”
Who’s Who Legal - „Friedrich is very thorough, quick and smart.”
Who's Who Legal - „He is a gifted drafter.”
Who’s Who Legal - „Friedrich has strong analytical skills.” / “He is an up-and-coming lawyer who is dedicated and sharp.”
Who’s Who Legal - „A brilliant mind.”
Who’s Who Legal - “His ability to promptly grasp the issues (both factual and legal) raised, as well as the clarity he expresses himself, both in writing and in discussions is very impressive.”
Who’s Who Legal - “He clearly has a deep theoretical knowledge of private law, combined with a practical mind and wide experience.”
Who’s Who Legal - “A true leader of his generation”
Who’s Who Legal
- Seit 2011
Rechtsanwalt bei HANEFELD, Hamburg - 2011
Consultant bei der United Nations Assistance to the Khmer Rouge Trials (UNAKRT), Phnom Penh - 2008 - 2010
Referendariat in Hamburg mit Auslandsstationen beim UN-Straftribunal für Rwanda in Arusha, beim UN-Straftribunal für das ehemalige Jugoslawien in Den Haag sowie bei K&L Gates LLP in Paris - 2007 - 2010
Wissenschaftlicher Assistent am Lehrstuhl von Prof. Dr. Dr. Rainer Hofmann, Johann Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt a.M. - 2007 - 2009
Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter bei Hogan Lovells LLP, Hamburg - 2008
Promotion zum Dr. iur. (summa cum laude), Johann Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt a.M. - 2002 - 2007
Studium der Rechtswissenschaften an der Bucerius Law School in Hamburg und der Columbia Law School in New York (Stipendium der Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes) - 2005
Praktikum bei der IOM in Genf, Bereich Claims Programmes - 2004
Praktikum bei der Deutschen Botschaft in Lima, Peru
- Global Professor of Law from Practice, NYU School of Law (Frühjahr 2020)
- Global Adjunct Professor of Law, NYU Law in Paris (seit 2016)
- Visiting Professor für Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit, International Hellenic University, Thessaloniki (seit 2013)
- Lehrbeauftragter für Internationales Investitionsschutzrecht, Bucerius Law School (seit 2014)
- Lehrbeauftragter für Internationales Investitionsschutzrecht, Universität Hamburg (2013/2014)
- Global Hauser Fellow from Practice and Government, NYU School of Law (2014)
| Datum | Event | Vortrag | Stadt | Land |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | THAC SIAC Seminar | The Interplay between Common Law and Civil Law in Arbitration | Bangkok | Thailand |
| 2022 | AIA CAM Seminar | Due Process in Arbitration | Milan | Italien |
| 2022 | DIA NYU Seminar | Evidentiary Matters at the Post-Award Stage | Copenhagen | Dänemark |
| 2022 | NYU and Sciences Po Conference | Deference in International Commercial Arbitration | Paris | Frankreich |
| 2022 | VIAC NYU Conference | The Normative Framework on Evidence | Vienna | Österreich |
| 2022 | Columbia University | The Shared Control over Arbitral Awards | New York | USA |
| 2022 | National University of Singapore | The New York Convention as an Instrument of International Law | Singapore | Singapur |
| 2021 | THAC Seminar | Contemporary Issues in International Arbitration | Bangkok | Thailand |
| 2021 | New York International Arbitration Week | Careers and Opportunities in International Arbitration | New York | USA |
| 2021 | Meeting of the American Society of Comparative Law | Jura Novit Arbiter | Wisconsin | USA |
| 2021 | National University of Singapore | Autonomous versus Domestic Standards under the New York Convention | Singapur | Singapur |
| 2021 | NYU Danish Institute of Arbitration | A Global Perspective on Due Process in International Commercial Arbitration | Kopenhagen | Dänemark |
| 2021 | Oslo University Webinar | Autonomous versus Domestic Standards under the New York Convention | Oslo | Norwegen |
| 2020 | NYU DIAC Webinar | A Global Perspective on Due Process in International Commercial Arbitration | Dubai | Vereinigte Arabische Emirate |
| 2020 | NYU Russian Arbitration Center Webinar | Due Process as a Limit to Discretion | Moskau | Russland |
| 2020 | NYU FGV Webinar | Due Process in International Commercial Arbitration | Sao Paulo | Brasilien |
| 2020 | SIAC Webinar | The Law Applicable to the Merits | Singapur | Singapur |
| 2020 | AIAC Webinar | Arbitration in a Contactless Society | Kuala Lumpur | Malaysia |
| 2020 | NYU | The IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence | New York | USA |
| 2020 | NYU | CISG in International Arbitration | New York | USA |
| 2019 | DIS | Case Management Tools for Saving Costs and Time under the DIS Rules | Thessaloniki | Griechenland |
| 2019 | NYU | Due Process in International Commercial Arbitration | New York | USA |
| 2019 | 14th International M&A Conference | Arbitration of M&A Disputes | Versailles | Frankreich |
| 2019 | Sciences Po | The Proposal for a Multilateral Investment Court | Paris | Frankreich |
| 2019 | Thai Arbitration Center | THAC NYU Arbitration Class | Bangkok | Thailand |
| 2019 | KCAB NYU Seminar on Inherent Powers of Arbitrators | Inherent Powers of Arbitrators | Seoul | Südkorea |
| 2019 | Lyon Conference | The Shared System of Control of Arbitral Awards | Lyon | Frankreich |
| 2019 | Belgrade Arbitration Conference | Inherent Powers of Arbitrators to Reconsider and Revise their Decisions | Belgrad | Serbien |
| 2019 | National University of Singapore | International vs. Domestic Standards in Arbitration | Singapur | Singapur |
| 2019 | NYU | Arbitral awards - What they are and what they are not | New York | USA |
| 2018 | Sciences Po | ISDS: Taking stock of criticism and proposals for reform | Paris | Frankreich |
| 2018 | Bucerius Law School | Conflict of Laws | Hamburg | Deutschland |
| 2018 | ISTAC | Limits to Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration | Istanbul | Türkei |
| 2018 | Hamburg Arbitration School | Hamburg Arbitration School | Hamburg | Deutschland |
| 2018 | Thai Arbitration Center | THAC NYU Arbitration Class | Bangkok | Thailand |
| 2018 | Conference on Conflicts of Law in International Arbitration | The Law Applicable to Legal Privilege in International Arbitration | Wien | Österreich |
| 2018 | National University of Singapore | The Hardening of Soft Law in International Arbitration | Singapur | Singapur |
| 2017 | Sciences Po | Inherent Powers of International Adjudicators to Reconsider and Revise their Decisions | Paris | Frankreich |
| 2017 | Arbitration Santo Domingo Conference | The Protection of Weak Parties in International Commercial Arbitration | Santo Domingo | Dominikanische Republik |
| 2017 | 3rd International Arbitration Congress | Diverging Approaches towards the Set-Aside of Arbitral Awards | Istanbul | Türkei |
| 2017 | Seminar of NYU and the Thai Arbitration Centre | International Commercial Arbitration / Challenges of Arbitrators / Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards | Bangkok | Thailand |
| 2017 | Conference on the Launch of the Cambridge Compendium on International Arbitration | Weak Parties in International Arbitration | Wien | Österreich |
| 2017 | ILA Committee Meeting | Rule of Law and Arbitration | Wien | Österreich |
| 2016 | Expert Workshop | Choice of Law Approaches in International Arbitration | Tilburg | Niederlande |
| 2016 | Walther Schücking Institute | The Backlash against Investment Protection | Kiel | Deutschland |
| 2016 | Conference on the Impact of EU Law on International Commercial Arbitration | The Rome Regulations in International Arbitration | New York | USA |
| 2016 | 12th International M&A Conference | Changing Paradigms of Investment Protection – TTIP and Beyond | Mailand | Italien |
| 2016 | Hanoi Law University | Seminar on International Arbitration | Hanoi | Vietnam |
| 2016 | AIJA Congress | Recent Developments in Energy Investment Arbitration | München | Deutschland |
| 2016 | Summer School in Transnational Commercial Agreements, Litigation and Arbitration | Procedural Challenges in International Arbitration | Vicenza | Italien |
| 2016 | OECD Capacity Building Workshop | Modernising International Investment Agreements and Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanisms | Jordan | Jordan |
| 2016 | Lions Club | Recent Challenges of Investment Arbitration | Hamburg | Deutschland |
| 2016 | America Center | The Investment Chapter of TTIP | Hamburg | Deutschland |
| 2015 | Hamburg Arbitration School | Introduction to Investment Arbitration | Hamburg | Deutschland |
| 2015 | Expert Workshop | The Proposal for a New Investment Court | Tilburg | Niederlande |
| 2015 | Herbstkonferenz der DSJV | The Future of Arbitration under TTIP | Berlin | Deutschland |
| 2015 | NYU | Limits to Party Autonomy to Protect Weak Parties in International Commercial Arbitration | New York | USA |
| 2015 | N.N. | Early Dismissal of Claims in Investment Arbitration | Tübingen | Deutschland |
| 2015 | IX International Seminar on Private International Law | The Distinction between Admissibility and Jurisdiction in International Arbitration | Madrid | Spanien |
| 2015 | Generations in Arbitration Conference | How to Win an Arbitration on Weak Points | Wien | Österreich |
| 2015 | Belgrade Arbitration Conference | Security for Costs in International Arbitration | Belgrad | Serbien |
| 2014 | N.N. | The Use of Investment Arbitration to Overcome Compliance Deficits with the New York Convention | Mexiko-Stadt | Mexiko |
| 2014 | Convergence and Divergence of Investment and International Commercial Arbitration Conference | Violating the New York Convention as Grounds for Claims under BITs | Santo Domingo | Dominikanische Republik |
| 2014 | NYU Global Fellows Forum | Bridging the Gap between Commercial and Investment Arbitration at the Enforcement Stage | New York | USA |
| 2014 | International Criminal Court | The State of the International Law on Reparations | Den Haag | Niederlande |
| 2014 | DIS40 Nord Event | Recent Developments in Investment Protection | Hamburg | Deutschland |
| 2014 | Joint ASIL/ILA Meeting | Possible Paradigmatic Changes in the Settlement of International Investment Disputes | Washington, D.C. | USA |
| 2013 | DIS40 Nord Event | Interplay of Public and Private Paradigms in International Investment Arbitration | Frankfurt am Main | Deutschland |
| 2013 | International Law Association Conference | Abstract Interpretations in Investment Law | Athen | Griechenland |
| 2013 | Global Law Week | Dispute Resolution in International Financial Transactions | New York | USA |
| 2013 | Development of Procedural Forms and Methods of Dispute Resolution | N.N. | Jekaterinburg | Russland |
| 2013 | European Lawyers Forum | Investment Arbitration | New York | USA |
| 2012 | N.N. | Seminar on Arbitration | Jerewan | Armenien |
| Jahr | Publikation | Fundstelle |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | The Handbook of Evidence in International Commercial Arbitration (Mitherausgeber) | F. Ferrari / F. Rosenfeld |
| 2022 | The Law Applicable to the Merits in International Commercial Arbitration (Co-Autor) | A. Bjorklund / S. Kröll / F. Ferrari, The Cambridge Compendium on International Arbitration |
| 2022 | Limitations to Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration (Co-Autor) | A. Bjorklund / S. Kröll / F. Ferrari, The Cambridge Compendium on International Arbitration |
| 2022 | Weak Parties in International Commercial Arbitration | A. Bjorklund / S. Kröll / F. Ferrari, The Cambridge Compendium on International Arbitration |
| 2021 | Autonomous versus Domestic Concepts in the New York Convention (Mitherausgeber und Co-Autor) | F. Ferrari / F. Rosenfeld |
| 2021 | International Commercial Arbitration: A Comparative Introduction (Co-Autor) | F. Ferrari / F. Rosenfeld |
| 2020 | Due Process as a Limit to Discretion in International Commercial Arbitration (Mitherausgeber und Co-Autor) | D. Czernich / F. Ferrari / F. Rosenfeld |
| 2020 | The Shared Control of Arbitral Awards | L. Di Matteo et al. (Hrsg.), The Cambridge Handbook of Judicial Control over Arbitral Awards, S. 441-455 |
| 2019 | Chapters on Expropriation, Fair and Equitable Treatment, State Responsibility & Compensation, Consent to Arbitrate and the Future of Investment Arbitration | F. Ferrari / B. King, Nutshell on Investment Arbitration |
| 2019 | The Law Applicable to Legal Privilege in International Arbitration | F. Ferrari / S. Kröll, Conflicts of Laws in International Arbitration |
| 2019 | The Hardening of Soft Law in International Arbitration | European Review of International Arbitration 2019, S. 19 ff. |
| 2018 | Inherent Powers of Arbitrators (Co-Editor) | F. Ferrari / F. Rosenfeld |
| 2018 | Inherent Powers of International Adjudicators to Reconsider and Revise their Decisions | European Review of International Arbitration 2018, S. 127 ff. |
| 2017 | Límites a la Autonomía de las Partes en Arbitraje Internacional (Co-Autor) | X Revista de Arbitraje Comercial y de Inversiones 2017, S. 335 ff. |
| 2017 | The Rome Regulations in International Arbitration – The Road Not Taken | F. Ferrari, The Impact of EU Law on International Commercial Arbitration |
| 2017 | Iura Novit Curia in International Law | European Review of International Arbitration 2017, S. 131 ff. |
| 2016 | Chapter 10: Germany | Jørgensen (Hrsg.): Finding, Freezing and Attaching Assets |
| 2016 | Arbitral Praeliminaria – Reflections on the Distinction between Jurisdiction and Admissibility after BG v. Argentina | Leiden Journal of International Law 2016, S. 137 ff. |
| 2016 | Yukos revisited – A Case Comment on the Set-aside Decision in Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) et al. v. Russia (Co-Autor) | IPrax 2016, S. 478 ff. |
| 2016 | Security for Costs in ICSID Arbitration – A Case Note on RSM v. St. Lucia | Arbitration International 2016, S. 1 ff. |
| 2016 | Limits to Party Autonomy to Protect Weak Parties in International Commercial Arbitration | F. Ferrari, Limits to Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration |
| 2016 | Regime Interactions between the New York Convention and International Investment Law - On Bridging the Gap between Commercial and Investment Arbitration at the Enforcement Stage (Co-Autor) | NYU Journal of Law & Business 2016, S. 295 ff. |
| 2016 | Early Dismissal of Claims in Investment Arbitration | A. Kulick (Hrsg.), Contracting Parties’ Reassertion of Control over International Investment Agreements and International Investment Treaty Arbitration |
| 2016 | Abstract Interpretations in International Investment Law | P. Pazartzis / M. Gavouneli (Hrsg.), Reconceptualising the Rule of Law in Global Governance, Resources, Investment and Trade |
| 2014 | The Trend from Standards to Rules in International Investment Law and its Impact upon the Interpretive Powers of Arbitral Tribunals | American Society of International Law, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting |
| 2013 | The New UNCITRAL Transparency Rules: How the Trend towards Transparency differs in Investment and Commercial Arbitration | Müller / Rigozzi (Hrsg.), New Developments in International Commercial Arbitration 2013 |
| 2013 | Mass Claims in International Law | Journal of International Dispute Settlement 2013, S. 159 ff. |
| 2012 | Individual Civil Responsibility for the Crime of Aggression | Journal for International Criminal Justice 2012, S. 249 ff. |
| 2012 | The Systemic Integration of International Investment Treaties and the New York Convention | NYU Transnational Notes |
| 2010 | Collective Reparation for Victims of Armed Conflict | ICRC Review 2010, S. 731 ff. |
- American Society of International Law
- Gelisteter Schiedsrichter des Asia International Arbitration Centre
- Bucerius Center for International Dispute Resolution (Mitglied)
- Bucerius Alumni Group on Public International & European Law (Co-Leiter)
- Gelisteter Schiedsrichter des Dubai International Arbitration Centre
- Gelisteter Schiedsrichter der European Organization for Mediation and Arbitration
- Deutsche Institution für Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit e.V. (DIS/DIS40)
- Hamburg Arbitration Circle
- ICC Commission on Arbitration and ADR
- ICC Young Arbitrators Forum
- ICC Task Force on Arbitration of Climate Change Related Disputes (Mitglied)
- ICDR Young & International
- International Bar Association, Arbitration Committee
- Young ICSID
- International Law Association, Mitglied des „Committee on Reparation for Victims of Armed Conflict” (2011-2014)
- International Law Association, Mitglied des „Committee on Rule of Law and International Investment Law” (seit 2015)
- Gelisteter Schiedsrichter des Vienna International Arbitration Centre (VIAC)
- Korea Commercial Arbitration Board (KCAB), Panel of International Arbitrators
- Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), Reserve Panel of Arbitrators
- Thailand Arbitration Center (THAC), Panel of Arbitrators
- Thailand Arbitration Center (THAC), Arbitrator Committee
